Hello Priyadarshi,
In theory this question doesn't really seem to have anything to do with Wireshark development, but is a question related to the a specific protocol. Nonetheless, here's the answer:
According to section
7.1 of the same specs you mention... <quote>MMS-field-name = Short-integer</quote>
According to "Basic rules" section of the WSP specs...
<quote>
Short-integer = OCTET
; Integers in range 0-127 shall be encoded as a one octet value with the most significant bit set
; to one (1xxx xxxx) and with the value in the remaining least significant bits.
</quote>
This is the cause of the addition of 0x80 to the assigned numbers in the encoded PDUs.
I think you have posted the same question at
http://discussion.forum.nokia.com/forum/showthread.php?t=117896, so I guess that's answered too!
Best regards,
Abhik.
On 10/10/07, Priyadarshi Parida <priyadarshi.parida@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi can one help me on this.
I had one query regarding MMSE protocol.
MMSE specs defined by OMA say the following:
7.4 Header Field Names and Assigned
Numbers
Bcc
0x01
Cc
0x02
X-Mms-Content-Location
0x03
Content-Type
0x04
Date
0x05
X-Mms-Delivery-Report
0x06
X-Mms-Delivery-Time
0x07
X-Mms-Expiry
0x08
From
0x09
Where as I find in some traces captured by Wireshark which
gives the values as
Bcc
0x81
Cc
0x82
X-Mms-Content-Location
0x83
Content-Type
0x84
Date
0x85
X-Mms-Delivery-Report
0x86
X-Mms-Delivery-Time
0x87
X-Mms-Expiry 0x88
From
0x89
Can u pls sugest on this.What could be the values for
that.it seems traces in Wireshark traces have values 80 added to every value
defined in specs.
Br
Priyadarshi.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
