Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] About a faster wireshark

["Didier" <dgautheron@xxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:20:36 +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote
> Hi,
> 
> One of the design goals of the Wireshark code base is portability. 
> This proposal seems to revolve around platform and compiler specific 
> hacks, contradicting this principle. So it will probably remain a
It's not, (ok there's four or five lines which are gcc/glibc).  

> seperate patch, not included in trunk. What do you propose on 
> maintenance of this patch? If it's not in trunk, I see no one 
I'm already doing it for a couple of years.
> picking it up and maintain it. There's another patch in the Wiki 
> (can you find it?) which I doubt anyone has used. What would be 
> great if usable portions could be extracted from your patch and 
> added to trunk. These will have to be portable though.

Well bugzilla doesn't like me (:

URL: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi
undef error - Undefined subroutine Fh::slice at
data/template/template/en/default/global/hidden-fields.html.tmpl line 58

When trying to attach a one line patch.

Didier