A tcp.port (range) and/or to register the heuristic dissector for
those cases where there's not necessarily a known port
On 8/2/07, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Should the XML dissector have a port (range) preference? Would be
> easier than LUA...
>
> Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
> > No, it would be enough to have the XML dissector register for the
> > given port in the tcp.port table.
> >
> > Or have the heuristic dissector register for TCP, but that would be expensive.
> >
> > -- lua snipplet that registers XML on tcp port 12345
> > DissectorTable.get("tcp.port"):add(12345, Dissector.get("xml"));
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/2/07, Rick Gudmundson <rickg421@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Suppose I've got a protocol that is simply XML running over TCP. I know that
> >> Wireshark is capable of dissecting XML data from HTTP packets, etc. What's
> >> the shortest/easiest way to dissect a conversation just as XML? Does it
> >> require a new XML dissector?
> >>
> >> Rick
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan
Propertarianism joined to capitalist vigor destroyed meaningful
commercial competition, but when it came to making good software,
anarchism won.
-- Eben Moglen
