Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems building Wireshark 0.99.6
From: "Maynard, Chris" <Christopher.Maynard@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:49:52 -0400
I've successfully built customized rpm's for Fedora Core 4 as well as later Fedora releases, but not specifically for FC3; however, I have also built rpm's for Red Hat 9, so in theory you should be able to build one for FC3. Can you verify that you first ran autogen.sh before running the configure script? (REF: Developer's guide, section 3.5.1: http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html/#id4719212, or the wiki: http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development) - Chris -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bryant, Stephanie Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 9:53 AM To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems building Wireshark 0.99.6 Hi, My apologies for the misspelling of the name. However, rpm tells me that the package is not installed and Locate only finds the source information that I downloaded. RPM query does not find it either. Stephanie -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Martin Peylo Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 9:41 AM To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems building Webshark 0.99.6 Hi, you should have an rpm in your distribution if you're searching for "Wireshark", not "Webshark" - provided that you're looking for a network protocol analyzer. Regards, Martin On 7/26/07, Bryant, Stephanie <sbryant@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Greetings, > > > > I am a newbie administrator and I am new to webshark. > > > > Does webshark exist as an rpm anywhere? > > > > I downloaded the latest source version of webshark from the website. > > I am experiencing difficulties building webshark 0.99.6 on Fedora Core 3 > Linux. > > > > Execution of the "configure" scripts ends in the following error messages: > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.0... Will use uninstalled version of GTK+ > found in PKG_CONFIG_PATH > > yes (version 2.10.14) > > checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/local/bin/pkg-config > > checking for GLIB - version >= 2.0.0... Will use uninstalled version of GLib > found in PKG_CONFIG_PATH > > yes (version 2.12.13) > > checking whether GLib supports loadable modules... no > > checking for inttypes.h... (cached) yes > > checking whether inttypes.h defines the PRI[doxu]64 macros... no > > checking whether %llx can be used to format 64-bit integers... no > > checking whether %Lx can be used to format 64-bit integers... no > > checking whether %qx can be used to format 64-bit integers... no > > configure: error: neither %llx nor %Lx nor %qx worked on a 64-bit integer > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > Also, GTK+ and GLIB were installed in /usr/local/lib > > > > I have attached to contents of the config.log file. > > > > Thank you for any assistance or further direction that you can provide. > > > > Stephanie > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > > > _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev ----------------------------------------- This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, retention, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Also, email is susceptible to data corruption, interception, tampering, unauthorized amendment and viruses. We only send and receive emails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption, interception, tampering, amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems building Wireshark 0.99.6
- From: Bryant, Stephanie
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems building Wireshark 0.99.6
- References:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems building Wireshark 0.99.6
- From: Bryant, Stephanie
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems building Wireshark 0.99.6
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems building Wireshark 0.99.6
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems building Wireshark 0.99.6
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems building Wireshark 0.99.6
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems building Wireshark 0.99.6
- Index(es):