Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] Fix IPMI Completion Codes
From: Al Chu <chu11@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:56:45 -0700
Hi Flavio,

(please, keep myself on CC as I'm not subscribed)

A few thoughts on your patch:

1) I think you should move the original:

       /* added by lane */
        { 0x81, "cannot execute command, SEL erase in progress" },

from ipmi_ccode_vals[] into a new array and add command specific error
support into get_ccode_cmd_text(). 

2) I believe your patch works for this particular instance, b/c in 0x39
is only used by the get session challenge command.  However (if you take
a look in table 44-11), there are many "commands" that use the same hex
"cmd" code.  (i.e. both get device id and get chassis status and get set
lan configuration parameters use cmd == 0x01.)  So get_ccode_cmd_text()
should key off both the cmd and the network function in order to
determine which command specific error code string array to use.

3)

The coding requirements and semantics for wireshark are largely unknown
to me, so I apologize if what I say below is faux pas for wireshark.

If a command specific error code is returned but doesn't have an command
specific array of strings supported, it should instead say "Command
Specific Error" instead of just "Unknown".

Al

-- 
Albert Chu
chu11@xxxxxxxx
925-422-5311
Computer Scientist
High Performance Systems Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory