I thought about doing it this way. It would make building the proto_tree a
little dorky, but doable.
I'm still left, though, with how to construct my header field definitions. I
could create a hf definition for every group that would match with the
value_string definitions, but this would make display filtering dorky, I
think.
--kan--
--
Kevin A. Noll, KD4WOZ
CCIE, CCDP
Versatile, Inc.
Kevin.Noll@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
+1-717-796-1936
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joerg Mayer
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 1:13 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Arrays of Value String arrays?
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 12:46:00PM -0400, Kevin A. Noll wrote:
>
>
> I'm dissecting TLVs in the WLCCP protocol. The TLVs are defined in a
> hierarchical manner, so the TLV is defined by a group_id and a type_id.
...
> I'm wondering if I can define a 2-dimensional value_string array sort
> of
> like:
static const value_string wlccp_tlv_group0_type_id ...
static const value_string wlccp_tlv_group2_type_id ...
ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
