hummmm ... do you meant
"Here is a patch for the management of the bad/good checksum for ISIS
(like TCP/UDP/IP).
support added for :
- booleans hf_isis_lsp_checksum_good, hf_isis_lsp_checksum_bad in the tree,
- information in the info column if bad checksum,
- expert info for bad checksum,
- color filters update"
Read in this context, it seems clear to me. At least it is clear that I
haven't updated a rule for OSPF which indicates that a new SPT has been
computed.
Anyway, as I said I don't care whether this rule is released ... I am
just a little bit circumspect about the reasons and tried to know more.
Regards,
Sebastien Tandel
Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 02:52:21PM +0100, Sebastien Tandel wrote:
>
>> I am not defending anything here (cause as you said I can change this
>> preference rule) but I don't get to the point. CDP is only implemented
>> on Cisco routers but there are also Juniper, Hitachi, Alcatel, Nortel,
>> 6wind etc... Having Cisco routers does not imply you'll configure CDP.
>> Furthermore, you clearly won't if there are others vendors routers in
>> your network. Last but not least, CDP does not seem to support IPv6. Do
>> you really think it's the best option?
>>
>
> Quite a few other vendors implement at least part of CDP. Also, I
> consider it bad style to introduce a change to the existing behaviour
> via a harmless reading changelog ("color filters update").
>
> ciao
> Joerg
>
