Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of anonymous union in epan/dissectors/packet-usb.[ch]

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of anonymous union in epan/dissectors/packet-usb.[ch]

From: "ronnie sahlberg" <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 10:29:49 +0000

Yes.
Currently get descriptor is the only real command from core usb that
is implemented.

Other commands, when implemented, will need to pass other kinds of
data between request and responses.


On 11/7/06, Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> checked in

So why is there a union with only one member?  Is that for future expansion?
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] Use of anonymous union in epan/dissectors/packet-usb.[ch]
  - From: Albert Chin
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of anonymous union in epan/dissectors/packet-usb.[ch]
  - From: ronnie sahlberg
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of anonymous union in epan/dissectors/packet-usb.[ch]
  - From: Guy Harris

Prev by Date: [Wireshark-dev] Patch for ACN
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1179] cmake build integration + dbus + bunch of memleak fixes
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of anonymous union in epan/dissectors/packet-usb.[ch]
Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Use of gcrypt and gnutls in version_info.c
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread