Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] usb dissecotr: register_dissector question

["ronnie sahlberg" <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

yes

On 10/15/06, Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> When looking at the dissector, I wondered whether the following patch
> would be ok/appropriate:
>
> Index: epan/dissectors/packet-usb.c
> ===================================================================
> --- epan/dissectors/packet-usb.c       (revision 19541)
> +++ epan/dissectors/packet-usb.c       (working copy)
> @@ -556,7 +556,7 @@
>      proto_register_field_array(proto_usb, hf, array_length(hf));
>      proto_register_subtree_array(usb_subtrees, array_length(usb_subtrees));
>
> -    register_dissector("eth", dissect_usb, proto_usb);
> +    register_dissector("usb", dissect_usb, proto_usb);
>  }
>
>  void
>
>
>
>  ciao
>     Joerg
>
> --
> Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
> works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev