Hi,
I've done *basic* versions of the protocol pages in the wiki:
http://wiki.wireshark.org/IPCProtocolFamily (*very* basic)
http://wiki.wireshark.org/LINX
http://wiki.wireshark.org/TIPC
Could someone please delete linx-example-capture-query-name.png and
linx-example-capture-query-name-sized.png which are attached to the
LINX site?
Regards,
Martin
On 10/9/06, Anders Broman (AL/EAB) <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
Chose the one you like :) it can always be changed later.
BR
Anders
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Martin Peylo
Sent: den 9 oktober 2006 09:35
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] New dissector for Enea's LINX protocol
Hi,
I was just starting to add LINX to the wiki but I'm not able to classify
it. It should be in the same category as TIPC but there's no entry for
that.
I would add something like ClusterProtocolFamily or
InterProcessCommunicationProtocolFamily - what do you think?
Regards,
Martin
On 10/6/06, Martin Peylo <martinmeis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm busy with other tasks right now but I'll add the protocol to the
> Wiki and upload sample captures within the next days!
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
>
>
> On 10/5/06, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now that we've added your dissector to the repository could you
> > write up a protocol page in the Wiki? Oh, the sample capture goes
> > onto SampleCaptures of course.
> >
> > Thanx,
> > Jaap
> >
> > On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Martin Peylo wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > could anybody please check the attached dissector for Enea's LINX
> > protocol?
> > >
> > > A protocol spec is available at
> > > <http://www.enea.com/templates/Extension____8947.aspx>. The source
> > > of the kernel module could be obtained from Enea by sending a
> > > request to "linx at enea dot com".
> > >
> > > Currently they use ethertype 0x9999 which is not registered at
> > > IEEE. I was told they requested one - what should to be done about
that?
> > >
> > > Please come back to me with any remarks!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Martin
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
