hi,
it isn't compatible at all(bsd licence), and i have already posted on
gnutls mailing list to propose a dtls implementation.
in a first time i think it could be a good idea to have an
implementation that work correctly and in a second time another to
test interoperability
I have only one month to consacrate to project i don't think that i
could make gnutls implementation in this time....(i will do all i can
because i would like a gpl'ed implementation)
gnutls have the advantage that it implement TLS 1.1 but in other side
it have to change a lot of things for UDP adaptation
I will try to finish openssl implem and in a second time i will look
at gnutls (if you are ready to help me ;) )
regards,
samuel
On 6/28/06, Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:31:28AM +0200, authesserre samuel wrote:
> but dtls work on openssl version 0.9.b who contains many errors (I
> have listed them on openssl-dev mailing list and correct 2 of them)
> but in current time i havent time to finish implementation of dtls
> (i'll try to correct it during july and dtls dissector in the same
> time)
Would it be feasible to use another lib than openssl (gnutls + gcrypt)
instead? I'm still not really convinced that the way we provide openssl
is really compatible with gpl (and especially distros enabling it).
Ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
--
Authesserre Samuel
12 rue de la défense passive
14000 CAEN
FRANCE
06-27-28-13-32
sauthess@xxxxxxxxx
