Wireshark · Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11698] Rescanning file with dispaly filter is much slower than opening file wi

Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11698] Rescanning file with dispaly filter is much slower

Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:44:47 +0000

Comment # 2 on bug 11698 from Xiaochuan Sun

Opening file with display filter lte_rrc costs 10.893 seconds
Rescanning file with display filter lte_rrc costs 30.401 seconds.
  Although rescanning file has different function call procedure from opening
file, but the rescanning performance is too weak comparing with openning.

You are receiving this mail because:

You are watching all bug changes.

References:
- [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11698] New: Rescanning file with dispaly filter is much slower than opening file with the same dispaly filter
  - From: bugzilla-daemon

Prev by Date: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11698] Rescanning file with dispaly filter is much slower than opening file with the same dispaly filter
Next by Date: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11698] Rescanning file with dispaly filter is much slower than opening file with the same dispaly filter
Previous by thread: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11698] Rescanning file with dispaly filter is much slower than opening file with the same dispaly filter
Next by thread: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11698] Rescanning file with dispaly filter is much slower than opening file with the same dispaly filter
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread