Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10328] SIP capture causes wireshark to crash 1.10.8
Jeff Morriss
changed
bug 10328
| What |
Removed |
Added |
| Status |
UNCONFIRMED
|
RESOLVED
|
| CC |
|
jeff.morriss.ws@gmail.com
|
| Resolution |
---
|
DUPLICATE
|
Comment # 2
on bug 10328
from Jeff Morriss
Looks like another dup of bug 9920 (which was fixed in master-1.12 and master
but not master-1.10):
~~~
#0 0x0000003d48c89444 in memset () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x0000003d4b4383da in g_hash_table_remove_all_nodes () from
/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#2 0x0000003d4b4390b1 in g_hash_table_remove_all () from
/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#3 0x0000003d4b43911e in g_hash_table_destroy () from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#4 0x00007f8653cb1d5b in srtp_add_address (pinfo=0x0,
pinfo@entry=0x7fff68e79920, addr=0x7f864e55b6d0, port=50006,
other_port=1314242008, setup_method=0x7f865433856a "SDP",
setup_frame_number=168,
Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'> There is no member named keys.:
is_video=0, rtp_dyn_payload=rtp_dyn_payload@entry=0x2f22c00, srtp_info=0x0)
at packet-rtp.c:884
#5 0x00007f8653cb1e23 in rtp_add_address (pinfo=pinfo@entry=0x7fff68e79920,
addr=addr@entry=0x7f864e55b6d0, port=<optimized out>,
other_port=other_port@entry=0,
Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'> There is no member named keys.:
setup_method=setup_method@entry=0x7f865433856a "SDP",
setup_frame_number=setup_frame_number@entry=168, is_video=0,
rtp_dyn_payload=0x2f22c00) at packet-rtp.c:899
#6 0x00007f8653ce8e76 in setup_sdp_transport (tvb=tvb@entry=0x2f27ea0,
pinfo=pinfo@entry=0x7fff68e79920,
exchange_type=exchange_type@entry=SDP_EXCHANGE_ANSWER_ACCEPT,
request_frame=request_frame@entry=168, delay=<optimized out>) at
packet-sdp.c:1887
#7 0x00007f8653cfc658 in dissect_sip_common (tvb=tvb@entry=0x2f20520,
offset=491, offset@entry=0, pinfo=pinfo@entry=0x7fff68e79920,
tree=tree@entry=0x2f20f60,
dissect_other_as_continuation=dissect_other_as_continuation@entry=0,
use_reassembly=use_reassembly@entry=0) at packet-sip.c:3198
#8 0x00007f8653d00111 in dissect_sip (tvb=0x2f20520, pinfo=0x7fff68e79920,
tree=0x2f20f60, data="" out>) at packet-sip.c:2036
#9 0x00007f865374e2bf in call_dissector_through_handle
(handle=handle@entry=0x2538b90, tvb=tvb@entry=0x2f20520,
pinfo=pinfo@entry=0x7fff68e79920, tree=tree@entry=0x2f20f60,
data=""
at packet.c:454
#10 0x00007f865374e938 in call_dissector_work (handle=0x2538b90,
tvb=tvb@entry=0x2f20520, pinfo_arg=pinfo_arg@entry=0x7fff68e79920,
tree=tree@entry=0x2f20f60, add_proto_name=add_proto_name@entry=1,
data="" at packet.c:549
#11 0x00007f865374f13c in dissector_try_uint_new (sub_dissectors=<optimized
out>, uint_val=uint_val@entry=5060, tvb=tvb@entry=0x2f20520,
pinfo=pinfo@entry=0x7fff68e79920, tree=tree@entry=0x2f20f60,
add_proto_name=add_proto_name@entry=1, data="" at packet.c:966
#12 0x00007f865374f197 in dissector_try_uint (sub_dissectors=<optimized out>,
uint_val=uint_val@entry=5060, tvb=tvb@entry=0x2f20520,
pinfo=pinfo@entry=0x7fff68e79920, tree=tree@entry=0x2f20f60)
at packet.c:992
~~~
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 9920 ***
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.
