Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 8647] SUM(tcp.time_delta)tcp.time_delta incorrect
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 21:42:00 +0000

Comment # 4 on bug 8647 from
OK, so what's going on is that the tshark display filter (-R or -Y depending on
your version) doesn't affect the packets passed to the statistics tap; it only
affects the packets displayed (of which there are none anyways because of -q).

What you want is to build the filter into the statistics tap instead. The
following works for me:

$ tshark -r ~/Downloads/file-copy.pcap -qz
"io,stat,0,SUM(tcp.time_delta)tcp.time_delta and tcp.srcport==445"

=================================================================
| IO Statistics                                                 |
|                                                               |
| Interval size: 51.8 secs (dur)                                |
| Col 1: Frames and bytes                                       |
|     2: SUM(tcp.time_delta)tcp.time_delta and tcp.srcport==445 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|              |1                  |2          |                |
| Interval     | Frames |   Bytes  |    SUM    |                |
|----------------------------------------------|                |
|  0.0 <> 51.8 |  18972 | 26654645 | 49.274044 |                |
=================================================================
$ tshark -r ~/Downloads/file-copy.pcap -qz
"io,stat,0,SUM(tcp.time_delta)tcp.time_delta and tcp.dstport==445" 

=================================================================
| IO Statistics                                                 |
|                                                               |
| Interval size: 51.8 secs (dur)                                |
| Col 1: Frames and bytes                                       |
|     2: SUM(tcp.time_delta)tcp.time_delta and tcp.dstport==445 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|              |1                  |2         |                 |
| Interval     | Frames |   Bytes  |    SUM   |                 |
|---------------------------------------------|                 |
|  0.0 <> 51.8 |  18972 | 26654645 | 2.557401 |                 |
=================================================================

These results looks like they match what you were expecting. Does this solve
the problem?

Evan

P.S. If this is the answer then I would welcome a suggestion on where we should
improve the documentation for it. I haven't spent much time on this particular
feature, but I admit it seems confusing...


You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are watching all bug changes.