Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 8589] [PATCH] 9P dissector enhancement
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 02:05:54 +0000

changed bug 8589

What Removed Added
Status UNCONFIRMED RESOLVED
CC   jeff.morriss.ws@gmail.com
Resolution --- FIXED

Comment # 16 on bug 8589 from
Checked in (after pulling the contents of the new header file back into the .c
file--we try to only use header files for sharing information between modules),
thanks for the contribution!

BTW I found that there is a 9P sample capture on the SampleCaptures page on the
wiki; it does appear your patch didn't break anything.

(In reply to comment #0)
> It is probably not good as it is, given it assumes packets are dissected
> once (and only once) in the stream order, which is not the correct. Any hint
> there is welcome.

I noticed this comment but I'm not sure what to make of it.  If you want to
know how to avoid doing something any time except on the first pass you can
look at pinfo->fd->flags.visited (it's set to 0 on the first
pass/dissection--when tree is NULL but frames are all dissected in order--and 1
on subsequent passes/dissections).


You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are watching all bug changes.