Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 8631] RFC 6887 Port Control Protocol Response 96 bit reser
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 16:10:57 +0000

Comment # 5 on bug 8631 from 
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > PROBLEM
> > =======
> > as per RFC 6887 the response header
> > has 96bit reserved bit, not 64. 
> > Without the attached patch, the PCP
> > Responses are parsed incorrectly
> 
> Has the RFC officially replaced the drafts (so documentation comments in the
> dissector should be updated)?

Yes, see also
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg11455.html

This patch is enabling functionality, we should add the reference to 6887 in
later versions, specifically as the Response Bit/Opcode part as per comment
above also needs rework. Would that make sense ? Or do you want to do it in a
all in one patch ?

Christian

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are watching all bug changes.