Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 7020] Review use of proto_tree_add_text in packet-eap.c
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7020
--- Comment #13 from Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-04 02:43:35 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Again, it was done like that for consistency. The existing code used eaptls and
> not eap.tls
>
> Thoughts?
Yes, but it is not good...
Checkfiltername.pl tools is not happy :
1233 eap_md5.value doesn't match PROTOABBREV of eap
1236 eap_tls.flags doesn't match PROTOABBREV of eap
1239 eap_tls.flags.len_included doesn't match PROTOABBREV of eap
1242 eap_tls.flags.more_fragments doesn't match PROTOABBREV of eap
1245 eap_tls.flags.start doesn't match PROTOABBREV of eap
1248 eap_tls.flags.version doesn't match PROTOABBREV of eap
1251 eap_tls.len doesn't match PROTOABBREV of eap
1254 eap_tls.fragment doesn't match PROTOABBREV of eap
1258 eap_tls.fragments doesn't match PROTOABBREV of eap
1262 eap_tls.fragment.overlap doesn't match PROTOABBREV of eap
1266 eap_tls.fragment.overlap.conflict doesn't match PROTOABBREV of eap
1270 eap_tls.fragment.multipletails doesn't match PROTOABBREV of eap
1274 eap_tls.fragment.toolongfragment doesn't match PROTOABBREV of eap
1278 eap_tls.fragment.error doesn't match PROTOABBREV of eap
1282 eap_tls.fragment.count doesn't match PROTOABBREV of eap
1286 eap_tls.reassembled.length doesn't match PROTOABBREV of eap
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.