Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5222] New: Enhanced packet-amqp.c to add dissection of AMQ
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5222
Summary: Enhanced packet-amqp.c to add dissection of AMQP 0-10
Product: Wireshark
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: Enhancement
Priority: Low
Component: Wireshark
AssignedTo: wireshark-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
ReportedBy: shuston@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Created an attachment (id=5164)
--> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5164)
Revised version of packet-amqp.c from svn trunk
Build Information:
wireshark 1.5.0 (SVN Rev 34125 from /trunk)
Copyright 1998-2010 Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> and contributors.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled with GTK+ 2.10.4, (64-bit) with GLib 2.12.3, with libpcap 0.9.4, with
libz 1.2.3, with POSIX capabilities (Linux), without libpcre, without SMI,
without c-ares, without ADNS, without Lua, without Python, without GnuTLS,
without Gcrypt, with MIT Kerberos, without GeoIP, without PortAudio, without
AirPcap.
NOTE: this build doesn't support the "matches" operator for Wireshark filter
syntax.
Running on Linux 2.6.18-194.8.1.el5xen, with libpcap version 0.9.4, with libz
1.2.3.
Built using gcc 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48).
--
I have added support for AMQP 0-10 to the existing AMQP 0-9 support in
packet-amqp.c. I've attached the resulting complete source. Would a diff be
more appropriate? It'll be a BIG diff...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
