https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5067
Bill Meier <wmeier@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #5051|review_for_checkin? |review_for_checkin+
Flag| |
--- Comment #4 from Bill Meier <wmeier@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-16 21:12:16 EDT ---
(From update of attachment 5051)
Committed: SVN #33824 & #33825
Thanks !!
I changed
namelen = tvb_get_ntohl(tvb, offset)
...
valuelen = tvb_get_ntohl(tvb, offset)
to:
namelen = tvb_get_ntohl(tvb, offset) & 0x7FFFFFF;
...
valuelen = tvb_get_ntohl(tvb, offset) & 0x7FFFFFF;
since the spec shows that the leading bit is not part of namelen and valuelen
when they are 4 byte values.
Please verify ....
I also added a comment as to a seeming bug in Wireshark tcp_dissect_pdus()
which seems to prevent appending anything to COL_INFO for the 2nd, 3rd, ...
FCGI PDU within a TCP frame.
(I willl file a separate bug for this).
Re:
> I haven't been able to reproduce the problem described in point 2 so perhaps
> you could explain in more detail what the problem is that you're seeing?
I must have been mistaken. The packet bytes highlighting for frame #98 is AOK.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.