Wireshark · Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5115] Restore <Ctrl>A and <Ctrl>X functionality to the filter textbox

[bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5115

Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Platform|Other                       |All
         OS/Version|Windows XP                  |All

--- Comment #2 from Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-16 16:50:59 PDT ---
> One would never want to mark or ignore all packets in the capture even if
> the capture is merged with another because those attributes are erased 
> when merged.

If those attributes are erased when merged, why would you ever want to mark or
ignore *any* packets?  What's so special about marking or ignoring all of them?

What if somebody wants, for whatever reason, to mark all but a few packets? 
The easiest way to do that would be to mark all packets and then selectively
unmark packets.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.