https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3803
--- Comment #4 from Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-08-03 03:40:04 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> ill write up some list soon.
>
> some of my wishes for the DNS dissectors are:
>
> - to support more DNS RRs, verify it from
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters
>
> - to show the base64 string of keys, like in DNSSEC, this tends to be useful
> coz when you check the signatures/public keys first few strings and compare it
> to what's being dissected
>
> - DNS dissector shows "Standard query <type> <fqdn>" but for its answer it
> just shows "Standard query response"
>
> it should be better to be "Standard response <type> <fqdn>" for easy tracking,
> no need to drill down the tree to look for the answer of the DNS query.
>
>
> - to provide a capture file of a DNS query-answer of the supported DNS RRs
> do you co
>
Sounds all reasonable to me.
> QUESTION, do I need to wait for the patches attached in bugzilla to be
> committed before I write more patches for other DNS rr support?
As long as they apply cleanly to svn HEAD there should be no problem. Otherwise
you'll be asked to recreate a patch against the then svn HEAD.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
