Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2187] New: MOS numbers are not interpreted correctly for R
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:46:37 +0000 (GMT)
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2187

           Summary: MOS numbers are not interpreted correctly for RTCP-XR
                    packets
           Product: Wireshark
           Version: 0.99.7
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows 2000
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Major
          Priority: High
         Component: Wireshark
        AssignedTo: wireshark-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        ReportedBy: bbhattac@xxxxxxxxx


Build Information:
Version 0.99.6a (SVN Rev 22276)

Copyright 1998-2007 Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> and contributors.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled with GTK+ 2.10.12, with GLib 2.12.12, with WinPcap (version unknown),
with libz 1.2.3, with libpcre 6.4, with Net-SNMP 5.4, with ADNS, with Lua 5.1,
with GnuTLS 1.6.1, with Gcrypt 1.2.3, with MIT Kerberos, with PortAudio
PortAudio V19-devel, with AirPcap.

Running on Windows 2000 Service Pack 4, build 2195, with WinPcap version 4.0.2
(packet.dll version 4.0.0.1040), based on libpcap version 0.9.5, without
AirPcap.

Built using Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 build 8804

Wireshark is Open Source Software released under the GNU General Public
License.

Check the man page and http://www.wireshark.org for more information.
--
The MOS numbers reported in the interpreted text display fail to show the digit
after the decimal point. For example when the MOS-Listening Quality byte is
0x25, it should be displayed as 3.7 but it is displayed as "MOS - Listening
Quality: 3.000000".

Just to report that Version 0.99.3 (SVN Rev 19011) of  Wireshark works
correctly.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.