Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1166] Missing part of BACnet decoder (with solution)
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:28:00 +0000 (GMT)
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1166





------- Comment #1 from jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx  2006-10-18 13:27 GMT -------
Oke, that came from:
-----------8<---------
  if (bacnet_control & BAC_CONTROL_SRC) { /* SNET, SLEN, SADR */
          /* SNET */
          proto_tree_add_uint(bacnet_tree, hf_bacnet_snet,
                  tvb, offset, 2, tvb_get_ntohs(tvb, offset));
          offset += 2;
-----------8<---------
So why is the SNET present in the message? Is bacnet_control missing the SNET
bit?


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.