Ethereal-users: Re: [Ethereal-users] Ethereal port naming question.

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 21:28:13 -0500
Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 02:00:40PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
>> I don't know whether "X" at the beginning of the name would be best, 
>> though; these days, "X" at the beginning of an new application's name 
>> isn't used a lot to indicate that it has an X11-based GUI, but in the 
>> old days of X11, that was used (nowadays, the letters "G" and "K" tend 
>> to be the ones used for that :-)), so it *might* be a bit confusing. 
>> I'm not sure what'd be a better version, other than, say, "MacWireshark" 
>> (although if, as, and when we have an official Aqua-based release, we'll 
>> probably just call it "Wireshark", just as we call the Windows version 
>> "Wireshark" and would probably continue to do so even if it didn't use 
>> any GTK+ code).
> 
> aquashark

Sounds good to me.  Kamil, is there any reason this should be a separate
project, and not integrated with the main release?
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-users mailing list
Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users