Wireshark · Ethereal-users: RE: [Ethereal-users] Forcing BSSAP over SCCP

["Anders Broman (AL/EAB)" <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,
There is two resources you can use:
http://www.alvestrand.no/objectid/top.html

Or

http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/en/oid/index.htm

Where the later is the better one I think, but it seems to be down at the moment.

Brg
Anders


 

-----Original Message-----
From: ethereal-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ethereal-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roger Mahler
Sent: den 25 april 2006 16:53
To: ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Ethereal-users] Forcing BSSAP over SCCP

Hello

Where can you actually look this up, that 826=uk, 1249=ericsson, etc.?

Rgds
Roger


-----Original Message-----
Hi,
It looks to be:
1.2.826.0.1249.51
{iso(1) member-body(2) uk(826) national(0) ericsson(1249) inDomain(51)} Intelligent Network (IN) Domain

Or is thats just wrongly decoded?

Brg
Anders

-----Original Message-----
From: ethereal-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ethereal-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roger Mahler
Sent: den 27 mars 2006 17:49
To: ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Ethereal-users] Forcing BSSAP over SCCP

Hello

in the attached capture I have 2 segmented XUDT frames that get nicely reassembled. 

The SSN are encoded as: 

- MSC (BSSAP-LE) (251)
- IOS or SMLC (BSSAP-LE) (252)

but I don't know if the layer above SCCP really is BSSAP.

How can I force Ethereal to decode the Reassembled Message using BSSAP dissector in order to see if it really _is_ BSSAP?
Or does anyone know what should be the right layer?

/Roger

--
GMX Produkte empfehlen und ganz einfach Geld verdienen!
Satte Provisionen für GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner _______________________________________________
Ethereal-users mailing list
Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users