Ethereal-users: Re: [Ethereal-users] TCP Sequence Number Differs From Sniffer Basic

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: "Ronnie Sahlberg" <ronnie_sahlberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 18:00:21 +1000
good idea.
i have checked in a change so that it will append "(relative sequence/ack
number)" to these lines when this option is enabled.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Martin Regner"
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 3:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] TCP Sequence Number Differs From Sniffer Basic


> Several people I know have been confused when comparing results between
> different tools and similar.
> I think that it might be good to add some information that the sequence
> number is relative when that
> setting is used, e.g. "Sequence number: 140 (relative)" or maybe show both
> the relative value and the non-relative value.