Ethereal-users: Re: [Ethereal-users] Problems Compiling 0.9.9 on OpenBSD 3.2-stable

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:25:40 -0800
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:21:02PM -0600, Eric wrote:
> Sure, the following inline is the config.log

	...

> configure:5020: checking whether the linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries
> configure:5715: result: yes
> configure:5720: checking how to hardcode library paths into programs
> configure:5744: result: immediate
> configure:5749: checking whether stripping libraries is possible
> configure:5757: result: no
> configure:5765: checking dynamic linker characteristics
> configure:6172: result: openbsd3.2 ld.so
> configure:6177: checking if libtool supports shared libraries
> configure:6179: result: yes

OK, I guess it got that right:

> configure:6182: checking whether to build shared libraries
> configure:6203: result: yes
> configure:6206: checking whether to build static libraries
> configure:6210: result: yes

So far, so good, although we don't actually build any shared libraries
on UNIX at this point, just dynamically-loadable modules.


> configure:10214: checking whether GLib supports loadable modules
> configure:10243: gcc -o conftest -D_U_="__attribute__((unused))" -Wall -W -g -O2 -I$(top_srcdir) -I$(top_srcdir)/wiretap -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/local/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include/glib-1.2  -I$(top_srcdir) -I$(top_srcdir)/wiretap -I/usr/local/include  -L/usr/local/lib conftest.c -L/usr/local/lib -lgmodule -lglib  >&5
> configure:10246: $? = 0
> configure:10248: ./conftest
> configure:10251: $? = 0
> configure:10266: result: yes

Good, and it got that right, too.

So I'm not sure what the heck is going on there.

> > Also, does a message like
> > 
> > 	libtool: link: warning: `AC_LIBTOOL_DLOPEN' not used.  Assuming
> > 	    no dlopen support.
> > 
> > appear anywhere in the output of the make?  (It appears in the output of
> > a build here on Solaris 2.8/SPARC, with automake 1.5, autoconf 2.57, and
> > libtool 1.3.4.; 
> 
> Nope, there were no such references in the file.

Could you send (in an attachment) the full output of the make?