Ethereal-users: RE: [Ethereal-users] Re: Problems loading libsnmp-0.4.2.1.so | Re solution
Title: RE: [Ethereal-users] Re: Problems loading libsnmp-0.4.2.1.so | Resolution
Hey guys,
That is exactly what the problem was. I guess I am a little dyslexic :) So I am up and running with this puppy, and boy does it kick butt. Thanks to all that helped me.
Billy
-----Original Message-----
From: HOOD, Andy [mailto:ahood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 7:21 PM
To: Guy Harris; billy o'connell
Cc: ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Ethereal-users] Re: Problems loading libsnmp-0.4.2.1.so
But that looks like he has both version 4.1.2 and 4.2.1.
Since they are in different directories there are probably two sets of headers also. I would suspect the 4.1 2 headers are in /usr/include and the 4.2.1 headers in /usr/local/include
Remove the 4.1 2 package, or uninstall and reinstall 4.2.1 specifying -prefix=/usr in the build
Regards,
Andrew Hood
A distributed system is one in which the failure of a computer you didn't even know existed can render your own computer unusable. -- Leslie Lamport, as quoted in CACM, June 1992
-----Original Message-----
From: Guy Harris [mailto:guy@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 May 2001 05:17
To: billy o'connell
Cc: ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] Re: Problems loading libsnmp-0.4.2.1.so
> What do ls -l /usr/lib/libsnmp* and ls -l /usr/local/lib/libsnmp* print?
>
> ls -l /usr/lib/libsnmp* ==>
>
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Apr 26 18:00
> /usr/lib/libsnmp.so.0 -> libsnmp.so.0.4.1.2
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 256347 Jul 20 2000
> /usr/lib/libsnmp.so.0.4.1.2
>
>
>
> ls -l /usr/local/lib/libsnmp* ==>
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 743151 May 4 13:47
> /usr/local/lib/libsnmp-0.4.2.1.so
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1366020 May 4 13:47
> /usr/local/lib/libsnmp.a
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 649 May 4 13:47
> /usr/local/lib/libsnmp.la
>
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 May 4 13:47
> /usr/local/lib/libsnmp.so -> libsnmp-0.4.2.1.so
Then I have absolutely no idea why the run-time linker (I'm presuming
that Ethereal *did* compile, but that it failed to run) didn't find
those header files; I'd suggest asking the supplier of the OS you're
running.
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-users mailing list
Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users