Ethereal-users: RE: [Ethereal-users] Quick Question for you.
Hrm...
Let me look into this a little more, but I was successful in getting the
latest version of Sniffer Pro to read files written by ethereal when saved
in the Sniffer for Windows format, PROVIDED that I named the file with a
.cap extension. Any other extension and Sniffer got confused.
Let me rerun the experiment, and verify exactly which version of Sniffer Pro
we used for that test.
--J
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn Sterling [mailto:shawn.sterling@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 5:42 PM
> To: 'Guy Harris'; Internet Security
> Cc: 'ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [Ethereal-users] Quick Question for you.
>
>
>
> > > Is there a way to capture data using tethereal with Network
> > associates
> > > Windows Based 2.00x format?
> >
> > Presumably you ultimately mean "is there any way to *write* capture
> > files that can be read by Sniffers?"
>
> Yes. Particularly I want to write a file with tethereal
> that will
> be readable with NAI's Sniffer Pro 4.0+ . Ethereal can read Sniffer
> Pro's format, so I thought there might be a sneaky way to
> also write it.
>
> > If the files it currently writes aren't readable by
> Sniffers, the only
> > way to do so would be to debug the current code into working.
> >
> > This would require somebody who has Sniffers to spend time with the
> > code, comparing files that work with the files written by
> > Ethereal, and
> > trying various things until they get something that the
> Sniffers *can*
> > read.
>
> Well, the current version of ethereal can read the Sniffer Pro
> format (which seams to be netxray in disguise), so I was
> thinking that
> if there was already a way to read it there must be some way
> to write it,
> but as you have pointed out this may not be the case at all.
>
> > If there is any *complete* documentation on the file formats
> > (sufficient
> > to allow the files to be written; some Sniffers had some
> documentation
> > on the file format, but it didn't describe the format of all the
> > records, and that wasn't even enough to allow us to write
> all the code
> > to *read* those files - we had to do some stuff by experimentation),
> > that would help.
>
> I don't think there was ever any documentation written ;) Its
> amazing
> what the ethereal people have accomplished.
>
> > NOTE: I don't have any Sniffers handy, so I can't be that
> > somebody (not
> > that I have the time to work on that in any case).
>
> Thanks for the prompt reply.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-users mailing list
> Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users
>