Ethereal-users: [ethereal-users] Re: [ethereal-dev] static vs dynamic column width

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: Guy Harris <gharris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 22:30:19 -0700
> OK, I'll look into having it start the columns at the current static
> sizes, and resize once the capture is done.

Well, I have something that seems to work.

However, I noticed in one test I was doing of a "-S" capture that if you
run without "-n", and some of the packets come from or go to addresses
with really long fully-qualified DNS names, you can end up with rather a
lot of real estate taken up by the source and/or destination addresses
when the autosizing is done.

Would it be better to make those particular columns not auto-resize, but
instead stick with the current static sizes?  Or are people willing to
just adjust the column sizes if they don't want those columns being that
wide?