Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] versions 0.9.8 and 0.10.14

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:59:22 +0200
-------------------
The Ethereal project is being continued at a new site.  Please go to
http://www.wireshark.org and subscribe to wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
Don't forget to unsubscribe from this list at
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
-------------------

On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:28:03AM +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> > With version 0.9.8 ethereal for RTP packets i obersved the
> > payloadtype 72 .But in the latest version 0.10.14 these packets are not
> > shown.Please clarify.
> >
> 
> Because Ethereal became RFC3550 compliant:
i...
>    in Appendix A.1.  For the standard definition of one marker bit and a
>    7-bit payload type field as shown in this specification, this
>    restriction means that payload types 72 and 73 are reserved.

@Jaap:
Well, if there is equipment that still uses 72 and 73, then there should
be a configuration option to allow the old behaviour back. We just had
that discussion a few days ago on the wireshark list. I consider just
changing a working feature so that it doesn't work after that any more
without providing a way back to the old behaviour a bug.

@jayasree:
Ethereal has become Wireshark (www.wireshark.org). Newer software
versions (like 0.99.2) are available over there. Support has moved to
the wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx list.

 Ciao
     Joerg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev mailing list
Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev