Wireshark · Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Last 4 days fixes and the 1.0 release

["Gilbert Ramirez" <gram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry that I haven't paid close attention to this, but what's the
time-frame for getting new features into the beta? I'm working on
adding functions to the display filter language... to support lower()
and upper() in string comparisons, but it's still going to be a while.

I'm fine with whatever schedule there is, but by knowing the time
frame I should be able to figure out if I target a release into the
beta branch, or just wait for some other future window after the 1.0
release.

thanks,

--gilbert

On 4/18/06, Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> W. Borgert wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > will the fixes of the last 4 days be integrated into the
> > upcoming 1.0 release? None, all, some? E.g. I would like to see
> > the GIOP fixes in 1.0. Thanks in advance.
>
> I have the following revisions slated to be copied from /trunk to
> /trunk-1.0:
>
> 17860: Null pointer exception in win32-file-dlg.c
> 17861: Skip non-data records in the Network Instruments code (bug 767)
> 17865: Fractional timestamp fix (bug 865)
> 17874: hcidump file fix
>
> Which GIOP revisions should be copied?  Is there anything else that
> should go into 0.99.0?
>
> I'll work on them this afternoon if I can stay out of meetings long enough.
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>
>