Ethereal-dev: RE: [Ethereal-dev] QSIG Support
Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.
From: "Anders Broman (AL/EAB)" <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:26:12 +0100
Hi, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QSIG lists a bunch of the standards downloadable from http://www.etsi.org/ Brg Anders -----Original Message----- From: ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Neiberger Sent: den 13 mars 2006 15:23 To: Ethereal development Subject: Re: [Ethereal-dev] QSIG Support Q.SIG is not the same as Q.931. Although they are related, Q.SIG and Q.931 have a number of differences. However, they may be close enough that, as you mention, the current Q.931 dissector might handle the decoding. I would be worried that without specific Q.SIG support we'd be missing all of the Q.SIG Supplementary Services. I'll see what I can dig up about the protocol. I know that the specifications are on the ECMA website. I'll try to find the relevant data and post it (or the links) to the list and/or the Wiki. Thanks, John On 3/13/06, LEGO <luis.ontanon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > AFAIK Q.SIG is Q.931 + some parameters and should be supported by the > current q931 dissector. > > On 3/13/06, Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping@xxxxxx> wrote: > > John Neiberger wrote: > > > I would really love to see support for Q.SIG in Ethereal and I > > > didn't see it on the current wish list. The Wiki page said to > > > check here before adding anything to the wish list, so I'm checking. > > > > > > > > Congratulation! You're the first one I know that actually follow the > > "official" process :-) > > > > This is just to prevent invalid and/or duplicate entries. > > > > I don't know anything about Q.SIG, you may just add it to the WishList. > > > As an FYI, my company is about to roll out a fairly large IP > > > telephony project that will involve a lot of Q.SIG interaction. It > > > would be extremely helpful to be able to span that traffic over to > > > Ethereal for analysis > > You may start a new Wiki page about this protocol and include a > > trace file and the protocol specs, making it much more likely that > > it will be implemented. > > > > However, there are no guarantees that it actually will be > > implemented at all, until you do the job yourself or find someone to do it. > > > > Regards, ULFL > > _______________________________________________ > > Ethereal-dev mailing list > > Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev > > > > > -- > This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself. > -- Marshall McLuhan > _______________________________________________ > Ethereal-dev mailing list > Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev > -- "Nothing will keep a person in everlasting ignorance so much as contempt prior to investigation" _______________________________________________ Ethereal-dev mailing list Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
- Prev by Date: Re: [Ethereal-dev] QSIG Support
- Next by Date: Re: [Ethereal-dev] QSIG Support
- Previous by thread: Re: [Ethereal-dev] QSIG Support
- Next by thread: [Ethereal-dev] Plugin problem
- Index(es):