I would really like to have MIT-Kerberos linked in with ethereal in
the w32 diastribution for a 1.0 release.
I cant build for w32 myself so i can not implement these changes or
test them, but since MIT do provide a build and shared libraries for
the w32 platform it should be possible?
As for gtk1, i use it but am fine with making it obsolete and not
distributing any gtk1 builds.
Do we need to remove the gtk1 code and defines from the source?
On 12/14/05, Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ulf Lamping wrote:
> > Gerald Combs wrote:
> >
> >> Is there any reason we shouldn't just jump to GTK 2.8? The GTK+ for
> >> Windows site is confusing. The front page says that 2.4 and 2.6 are
> >> the current versions, but the download page says that 2.8 is.
> >
> >
> > Well, the GTK for Win32 homepage was always a bit confusing :-)
> >
> > I would think the current stable to be the 2.6, as this is also the
> > version of the files provided on the download page (I would like to use
> > files from that page rather than compiling from source). The 2.8 is
> > mentioned, but I don't see any files.
>
> A link to ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/v2.8/win32/ is on the GTK for Win32
> download page, but it's not very prominent.
>
> > The last time I asked Tor (few weeks ago?) of the current state, he
> > noticed that 2.4 is rather old and we should update to 2.6 or 2.8.
> >
> > He was planning to declare the 2.8 as the new stable version but there
> > seems to be no changes since then.
> >
> > The Gimp (which seems to be the main source of operation for the GTK
> > Win32 port) also currently uses 2.6.9, so we might want to switch to
> > this version for now.
> >
> > Changing from 2.6 to 2.8 seems to be less painful than the 2.4 to 2.6
> > versions (which was requiring the file function wrappers I've already
> > done)...
>
> You must have done all of the hard work. Adding 2.8 support was pretty
> straightforward. I added the 2.6 and 2.8 libraries and header files to
> the ethereal-win32-libs SVN repository, along with updating ADNS and
> PCRE. I changed config.nmake to build against 2.8 by default so that it
> will ship with the automated builds. We can back off to 2.6 or 2.4 for
> the official release if needed.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>
