Ethereal-dev: SV: [Ethereal-dev] Re: [Ethereal-cvs] rev 16293:/trunk/epan/dissectors/: Makefil
Hi,
No there seems to be no good way to determine if it's NBAP or not :(
Brg
Anders
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] För LEGO
Skickat: den 24 oktober 2005 23:34
Till: ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Ämne: [Ethereal-dev] Re: [Ethereal-cvs] rev 16293:/trunk/epan/dissectors/:
Makefile.common packet-nbap.cpacket-nbap.h /trunk/asn1/nbap/: Makefile
Makefile.nmakenbap.asn nbap.cnf packet-nbap-template.c
packet-nbap-template.h
Good Thing!
Is there a way to heuristically recognize whether a frame contains NBAP?
The other signalling protocol used on the IuB is ALCAP which doesn't
have a good heuristic.
Both are used straight on top of UNI-SAAL (sscop) so we need a way to
determine whether we have one or the other. (do we do this in sscop?).
Luis
On 10/24/05, etxrab@xxxxxxxxxxxx <etxrab@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> User: etxrab
> Date: 2005/10/24 04:23 PM
>
> Log:
> UMTS Node B Application Part(NBAP) packet dissection(3GPP TS 25.433
version 6.6.0 Release 6)
> All IE:s not dissected yet.
>
> Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
> Changes Path Action
> +2 -0 Makefile.common Modified
> +45286 -0 packet-nbap.c Added
> +42 -0 packet-nbap.h Added
>
> Directory: /trunk/asn1/nbap/
> Changes Path Action
> +17 -0 Makefile Added
> +42 -0 Makefile.nmake Added
> +16953 -0 nbap.asn Added
> +90 -0 nbap.cnf Added
> +2499 -0 packet-nbap-template.c Added
> +35 -0 packet-nbap-template.h Added
>
>
>
> http://anonsvn.ethereal.com/viewcvs/viewcvs.py?rev=16293&view=rev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-cvs mailing list
> Ethereal-cvs@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-cvs
>
--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev mailing list
Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
