Wireshark · Ethereal-dev: [Ethereal-dev] Re: [Ethereal-bugs] [Bug 209] too long line in /home/tfoerste/.ethereal/recent

[LEGO <luis.ontanon@xxxxxxxxx>]

I got it wrong!

IT IS a bug, while a MAX_VAR_LEN of 100 bytes is fine for most
preferences it is short for filter strings.

I'm looking if it would be a problem to set it to a higher value.

 
B.T.W. once a BUG is marked as RESOLVED it cannot be put back into
another state (that is a a solution cannot be rejected).

On 5/27/05, bugzilla-do-not-reply@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<bugzilla-do-not-reply@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> http://bugs.ethereal.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209
> 
> 
> luis.ontanon@xxxxxxxxx changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>          AssignedTo|ethereal-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxx  |luis.ontanon@xxxxxxxxx
>             Summary|too long line in            |too long line in
>                    |/home/tfoerste/.ethereal/rec|/home/tfoerste/.ethereal/rec
>                    |ent                         |ent
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ethereal.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-bugs mailing list
> Ethereal-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-bugs
> 


-- 
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan