Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Initial splitcap?

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Gilbert Ramirez <gilbertr@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 22:42:36 -0600
Sure. Something is better than nothing.

--gilbert


On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:53:35 -0500, Ian Schorr <ethereal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi list,
> 
> For a while I'd been meaning to submit a "splitcap" tool to provide
> rich command-line splitting capabilities.  I'd planned on extending
> Graeme Hewson's submitted splitcap util (and making it work), but just
> haven't had the time.
> 
> I do, however, have an extremely simple splitcap utility available now
> - it simply allows the user to split a file, either into <n> number of
> slices of equal # of packets, or to split a file into (up to, optional)
> <n> number of slices of size <p>.  Files are created in user-specified
> location (or local dir by default) in format originalfilename +
> "-splitxxxx".
> 
> Usage is as follows:
> 
> Usage: splitcap [-h] [-s <# of frames>] [-n <number of slices>]
> <capfile> [destination directory]
>    where        -s <# of frames> specifies the number of frames per slice
>                 -h produces this help listing
>                 -n <number of slices> specifies the maximum number of slices to
> create.  If specified without -s, creates the specified
>                         number of slices, of equal number of packets each.  If specified
> with -s, creates up to the specified number of
>                         slices, of the specified number of packets each.
>                 <capfile> is the name of the file to split.
>                 [destination directory] is the location where split files will be
> saved.  If no directory is specified, the local directory is
>                         assumed.  Slices are saved with name "<capfile>-splitxxxx", where
> xxxx is the split number.
> 
> I constantly find this extremely useful, mostly since it's magnitudes
> faster than repeatedly running editcap since I only have to take one or
> possibly two read passes through the file, and with very large files
> this might mean the difference between an hour or days to split - and
> figure others might find it the same.
> 
> Since it doesn't look like the more rich splitcap is coming anytime
> soon, should I go ahead and submit this "simple" splitcap?
> 
> Ian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
> 
>