Wireshark · Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] sctp changes not portable on win32, getting lot's of errors!!!

[Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Guy, Ulf,
I just looked at winsock.h ad winsock2.h. They do have no
support for sockaddr_storage and IPV6. It was cygwin on
Windows which provided these structures.

So the code needs changes... I'll make sure that it
runs on (at least one) Windows version before 'activating'
it again in Makefile.common.

Best regards
Michael

On Sep 7, 2004, at 11:42 Uhr, Michael Tuexen wrote:

> Hmm,
>
> I'm sorry for any inconvenience, but I did not compiled it on 
> Windows...
> As far as I know struct sockaddr, struct sockaddr_in and struct 
> sockaddr_storage
> are supported on Windows, because they support the SocketAPI (possibly 
> by
> including a winsock.h or something like that). Am I wrong?
>
> I have taken these files out the Makefile.common, so this stuff should 
> not
> be compiled anymore.
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>
> On Sep 7, 2004, at 11:22 Uhr, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> > Ulf Lamping wrote:
> >
> > > sctp_stat.c
> > > sctp_stat.h(82) : error C2079: 'src' verwendet undefiniertes struct 
> > > 'sockaddr_storage'
> > > sctp_stat.h(83) : error C2079: 'dst' verwendet undefiniertes struct 
> > > 'sockaddr_storage'
> >
> > It would probably be A Very Good Idea not to use OS data structures 
> > such as "sockaddr_in", "sockaddr_in6", "sockaddr_storage", etc. for 
> > addresses, given that not all OSes have all those data structures. 
> > Perhaps we should just use Ethereal's "address" structures instead.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ethereal-dev mailing list
> > Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev