Ethereal-dev: RE: [Ethereal-dev] [Fwd: ClearSight Analyzer's use of Etherealdec odeengine]
> From: Ronnie Sahlberg [mailto:ronnie_sahlberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>
> wouldnt he be interested in running a case
> to its full
> fuition?
> where out of court settlement were not a viable option?
It is not clear to me that it isn't viable. ClearSight has to release their
patches to Ethereal. But, IIUC, if they can produce a product that works
with or without the ethereal DLL then they could charge for that, and
provide Ethereal under GPL as a plug-in. Or they could provide Ethereal as a
seperate executable, running in a seperate window. ISTR their app does more
than just wrap Ethereal, although Ethereal is probably the majority of the
functionality. An Ethereal patch to produce a DLL would have value to the
Ethereal project.
Now at least the DLL situation would be right in the middle of the GPL grey
area, so I think we should consult our consciences and the FSF legal team.
Not necessarily in that order.
I would guess that ClearSight would still not go to court, even if the
alternative was taking the Analyser off the market. Rather just do that,
than do that and pay court costs.
--
Richard Urwin, Private
"No 9000 series computer has ever made a mitsake or corrubiteddatatato."
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
