Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Made a lot of GUI changes today!

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:47:44 -0800

On Jan 27, 2004, at 1:00 AM, Ulf Lamping wrote:

Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 27.01.04 08:33:34:
On my NT 4.0 machine, with GTK+ 1.3[.x], it seems to pick a font that
looks as if it might be the menu font, but picks a size smaller than the
one in Windows applicatin menu bars.

So I fear, this is almost unreadable?

Not for me, but I have reasonably good vision - some might find them too small.

(That stuff ultimately belongs in GTK+)

Hardly agree with that, but as you've written, unless they do it, we have to do it ourselves!

Maybe GNOME handles this completely different, so it doesn't have a problem here. And as I think the main GTK development is done by developers running GNOME,
they might even see that this is a problem?!

Well, there is, in theory, the XSettingsRegistry stuff I mentioned - the problem is that the system font item is GTK+-specific, so it won't, for example, pick up the system font on a KDE system. (Ethereal looks odd on my home laptop's KDE 3.0 desktop - the GTK+ system font is bigger.) I suspect freedesktop.org would have to come up with a standard for font descriptions in order to make that work across toolkits/desktop environments. (Or would you just specify a font family, with menu bars always choosing normal style, normal weight, etc.?)