Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] RFD: Set Reply-To to list if not already set

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:54:25 -0800

On Jan 20, 2004, at 10:44 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote:

Just a thing that has been annoying me for a while now: In many cases,
I receive two answers, when I post to this list: One to the list and one
to me personally. In order to avoid that, I need to set the reply-to to
the list address.
In most cases a reply to the list would be the preferred behaviour anyway,
so would it
a) be doable with the current mailman software to change an empty (aka
   non existent) reply-to to the list address

According to the GNU/Mailman Administrator's Manual for, presumably, Mailman V2:

	http://staff.imsa.edu/~ckolar/mailman/mailman-administration-v2.html

There's a setting for "Where are replies to list messages directed?", which can either be "poster", "this list", or "explicit address". That section says:

While the program suggests that this be set to poster, you should consider the purpose of the list in selecting this value. Lists that intend to focus on discussion are best set to "list" to encourage conversation. Lists used for announcements are best set to poster to prevent unwanted traffic and the inadvertent broadcast of replies.

b) preferrable to most list members?

I'd prefer it, as not only would it reduce the duplicate replies, it'd also mean that if person X asks a question, and person Y replies, person X would have to make an effort to reply to person Y's reply and have the reply go only to person Y rather than to the list, i.e. they'd have to make an explicit choice to act as if person Y had somehow announced that they have taken full responsibility for person X's problem.

I'd vote for ethereal-users working the same way.