Wireshark · Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Re: [WinPcap-bugs] Problems with defining inline, when winpcap3.0 combined with

[Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping@xxxxxx>]

Loris Degioanni wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>  
>
> > Hi List!
> >
> > When compiling Ethereal (a network protocol analyzer) using MSVC, I (and
> > a lot others) are getting the following warning:
> >
> > D:\ulfl\proj\Ethereal\libs\WPdpack\include\gnuc.h(18) : warning C4005:
> > 'inline' : Makro-Neudefinition
> >
> > D:\ulfl\proj\Ethereal\libs\ethereal.com\include\glib-2.0\glib/gutils.h(95)
> > : Siehe vorherige Definition von 'inline'
> >
> > The source sequence producing this warning looks like this:
> >
> > #include <gtk/gtk.h>
> >
> > #ifdef HAVE_LIBPCAP
> > #include <pcap.h>
> > #endif
> >
> > As the glib/gtk already defines 'inline', pcap.h has some problems with
> >    
> it.
>  
>
> > When switching the sequence (including pcap.h before gtk.h), the warning
> > does not appear.
> >
> > I'm using winpcap version 3.0.
> >
> > Is it possible, to define 'inline' only, if it's not already defined?
> >    
>
> No problems, but are you sure you are using version 3.0 of the WinPcap
> develper's pack? In this version, gnuc.h is no more included by bpf.h, and
> therefore by pcap.h. As a consequence, WinPcap and the developer's pack
> tools don't use gnuc.h at all. Unless Ethereal explicitly includes gnuc.h,
> and unless I'm missing something, you should have no problems with it.
>
> Loris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>
>  
Gotcha, you got me!

It seems, that I'm using version 2.3, as the README.txt in my wpdpack 
dir tells me.

Sorry for any confusion on this topic.

I will update to version 3.0, and check if the problem persists.

In any case, I will send you a response on this in the next days.

Regards, ULFL