Ethereal-dev: RE: PDML from tethereal, was Re: [Ethereal-dev] New "matches" (PC RE support) pa

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: Biot Olivier <Olivier.Biot@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 22:17:59 +0100 
I got some brilliant (heh heh) idea: why can't we write PDF instead of or in
addition to PS? It's basically extremely similar to PS... and it's available
to everybody.

| -----Original Message-----
| From: Gilbert Ramirez
| 
| On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 20:24, Guy Harris wrote:
| > Should we force the verbose flag on when "-T ps" or "-T pdml" is
| > specified?  (Actually, does "-T ps" require "-V"?  I think 
| we can print
| > summaries in PostScript from Ethereal - if not, that's 
| arguably a bug.)
| > 
| 
| Verbose flag: I don't know. I chose not to, thinking that unexpected
| behavior is bad; i.e., the use requests one behavior (unknowingly) and
| gets another. It's unimportant to me... if we think -V should 
| be forced
| with -Tpdml, then fine.
| 
| You're right; ethereal *can* print a packet summary in postscript. I
| wasn't aware of that. I'll make a fix for "-Tps". thanks,