Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Ethereal performance, after Guy's changes ...
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, here are the first 20 or so entries from the gprof report after
> Guy's changes. In addition, it definitely does feel faster:
>
> Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
> % cumulative self self total
> time seconds seconds calls s/call s/call name
> 5.31 0.11 0.11 1769355 0.00 0.00 free_node_field_info
> 4.83 0.21 0.10 1769355 0.00 0.00 alloc_field_info
> 4.35 0.30 0.09 1769355 0.00 0.00 proto_tree_add_node
So, these three look like they are called together and amount to about
14.5 to 15% of the time.
> 3.86 0.38 0.08 1769384 0.00 0.00 fvalue_free
> 3.38 0.45 0.07 1606569 0.00 0.00 proto_tree_add_pi
> 2.90 0.51 0.06 1309912 0.00 0.00
> compute_offset_length
> 2.90 0.57 0.06 436851 0.00 0.00
> proto_tree_add_boolean
> 2.90 0.63 0.06 170928 0.00 0.00 ip_to_str_buf
> 2.42 0.68 0.05 192815 0.00 0.00 get_cell_style
> 2.17 0.72 0.04 1253012 0.00 0.00 proto_tree_set_uint
> 1.93 0.77 0.04 3279570 0.00 0.00
> proto_registrar_get_nth
> 1.93 0.81 0.04 1007118 0.00 0.00
> ensure_contiguous_no_exception
> 1.93 0.84 0.04 299096 0.00 0.00 set_cell_contents
> 1.93 0.89 0.04 162786 0.00 0.00 proto_tree_add_item
> 1.93 0.93 0.04 21364 0.00 0.00 col_init
> 1.69 0.96 0.04 1779481 0.00 0.00 tvb_raw_offset
>
> Regards
> -----
> Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org,
> sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>
--
Regards
-----
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org,
sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com
