Ethereal-dev: RE: [Ethereal-dev] Portability patches

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: "Michael Lum" <mlum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:42:47 -0800
The malloc() change for the definition of ett does not appear to work.

My last patch is good but the malloc/pointer stuff isn't.

Ethereal will core:


** ERROR **: file proto.c: line 2084 (proto_item_add_subtree): assertion
failed: (idx >= 0 && idx < num_tree_types)
aborting...
Abort(coredump)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Albert Chin
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 2:18 PM
> To: ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Portability patches
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 12:18:53PM -0800, Guy Harris wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 9, 2003, at 4:20 PM, Albert Chin wrote:
> >
> > >>>3. P_SID in <sys/procset.h> on HP-UX 10.20 and Tru64 UNIX.
> > >>
> > >>I checked in a change a few days ago to get rid of includes of
> > >><gmodule.h>, <sys/types.h>, and <netinet/in.h>; I don't think they're
> > >>needed, and they might keep <sys/procset.h> from being included.
> > >>
> > >>See whether getting rid of those #includes, and reverting back to
> > >>P_SID,
> > >>works.
> > >
> > >I copied the latest packet-ansi_a.c from CVS and still get the error.
> >
> > I'm curious what causes all that stuff to be included, in case there's
> > some #include we can get rid of.  Any idea?
>
> Nothing we can do. On HP-UX 11.00, <stdlib.h> brings it in (in
> <wait.h> in this case).
>
> --
> albert chin (china@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev