Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Please Compile the ethereal once on window before every relea
----- Original Message -----
From: "Guy Harris" <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Richard Sharpe" <rsharpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Ethereal Com" <ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Naveen Kumar Kaushik"
<naveenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Please Compile the ethereal once on window
before every release
>
> On Sep 9, 2003, at 11:17 PM, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>
> > Typically we know that the CVS tree builds on a range of UNIX-like
> > platforms, including Linux, FreeBSD, perhaps Solaris, etc, but we do
> > not
> > have a build-farm, so we can't guarantee that it builds on all
> > platforms.
>
> ...and there are many platforms to consider (see, for example, the list
> under
>
> http://www.ethereal.com/download.html#binaries
yes there are many platforms to consider but a large number of people use
either Unix like OS (Unix,FreeBSD,Linux ) or win32. I personally feel this
is a reason to take window compilation seriously since atleast on Unix type
OS compilation is smooth. Please correct me if i am wrong .
>
> I don't know if the Written Word people would be willing to participate
> in the pre-release build process, but that might be useful.
>
> The SourceForge Compile Farm:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=762&group_id=1
>
> might also be useful, although they don't have Slackware (which has
> occasionally been the source of build problems) or Gentoo - I don't
> know whether Mandrake is still sufficiently Red Hat-like that a Red Hat
> build should work. They also don't have RH 8 or RH 9. They have Mac
> OS X with Fink; I don't have Fink indtalled, so I could do a build to
> make sure the tarball builds without Fink. (We should test the tarball
> - there might be differences between what CVS does and what the tarball
> does.)
>
>
>
