-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002 07:55, Guy Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 07:38:27AM +1100, Brad Hards wrote:
> > I only sent it late last week, but it is pretty simple. I'm just
> > concerned that it slipped by, and hasn't been reviewed, since I got no
> > response.
>
> People shouldn't assume that they will get a quick response to patches
> sent in, especially if the patches are sent during a national holiday
> for a country in which many developers live. :-) I didn't get to look
> at the patch, or check it in, until today.
I wouldn't normally worry about a patch until at least a week has elapsed
(hence my comment about "only sent it late last week"), but that would likely
have missed the next release. So I queried it.
Of course, if I'd waited a few minutes I would have gotten your email, and
been a lot less embarressed about crying out "my patch, my patch" like a dumb
newbie.
Thanks again.
Brad
- --
http://linux.conf.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Aust. I'm registered. Are you?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE96nhyW6pHgIdAuOMRAmWjAKCDdHQYqzd2JUgGQmhwnnA8vjOamgCglfHY
7yxoigyMeX0STwJjeEAN++A=
=0EdS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
