Ethereal-dev: RE: [Ethereal-dev] RE: [Ethereal-users] Not seeing RTP or RTCP tr affic on Win2K
Every Ethereal user appreciates all the effort that has gone into Ethereal.
You, Guy, are appreciated by every user on the Ethereal-users list. You
answer every question with verbose and complete explanations. I am not
suggesting they are smarter or that they do anything better since they are
paid for their work. It is just different.
If the day ever comes when the save as code is there and you do need someone
to test it, I certainly can. If it never comes, that is OK too.
Thanks again for everyone's effort!
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: Guy Harris [mailto:guy@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:05 PM
To: Joe Aiello
Cc: ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-dev] RE: [Ethereal-users] Not seeing RTP or RTCP tr
affic on Win2K
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0700, Joe Aiello wrote:
> I think this was misleading. Sniffer WAN files is terminology in Sniffer
> (in their save/as dialog). WAN seems to refer more to their current
Windows
> version file format. They are not PPP, but Ethernet captures. Since
> Ethereal can already read the format (as identified in Ethereal as Sniffer
> Windows 2.00x), someone knows the file format.
Well, then, if "WAN", as they're using it, has nothing to do with Wide
Area Networks, and those are just Ethernet captures, I guess it's just a
question of somebody having the time and energy to try adding support
for writing that format (I don't - even if it's just cut, paste, and
modify, there's also the "test" stage, and I don't have a Sniffer handy
to read them, and don't have the time and energy for teledebugging with
somebody who does).
> As for RTP, they do it somehow and I have yet to have a misrepresented
> packet.
Well, perhaps they're either smarter than us, or have more time to spend
looking at the problem and implementing something (they're paid to do
that, most of us aren't).
