Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Ethereal 0.9.1 segfault during filtering (w/gdb backtrace)

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: Gilbert Ramirez <gram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 11:37:42 -0600
On Fri, 08 Feb 2002 08:55:51 Erik Inge Bolsø wrote:
> 
> #0  0x403e99f1 in __kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
> #1  0x403e96d4 in raise (sig=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27
> #2  0x403eae31 in abort () at ../sysdeps/generic/abort.c:88
> #3  0x40290bfe in g_logv () at eval.c:88
> #4  0x40290cb2 in g_log () at eval.c:88
> #5  0x81d2bf2 in alloc_field_info (tree=0x847a514, hfindex=3937, tvb=0x0,
> start=0, length=-1)
>     at proto.c:1613
> #6  0x81d16ca in proto_tree_add_item (tree=0x847a514, hfindex=3937,
> tvb=0x0, start=0, length=-1,
>     little_endian=0) at proto.c:534
> #7  0x8144516 in dissect_mailslot_smb (mshdr_tvb=0x0, setup_tvb=0x0,
> tvb=0x84753d0, mailslot=0x0,
>     pinfo=0xa056da8, parent_tree=0x847a514) at packet-smb-mailslot.c:134
> #8  0x8141287 in dissect_transaction_response (tvb=0x8475368,
> pinfo=0xa056da8, tree=0xbbc55fc, offset=32,
>     smb_tree=0xbbc5598) at packet-smb.c:11595


Thanks. Apparently the comment before line 11595 in packet-smb.c is wrong.

                        case TRANSACTION_MAILSLOT:
                                /* This one should be safe to call
                                   even if s_tvb and sp_tvb is NULL
                                */
                                if(d_tvb){
                                        dissected_trans = dissect_mailslot_smb(
                                                sp_tvb, s_tvb, d_tvb, NULL, pinfo,
                                                top_tree);
                                }

--gilbert