Ethereal-dev: RE: [Ethereal-dev] Where to find more protocols for ethereal

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: "Neulinger, Nathan" <nneul@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:02:45 -0600
Seems to me that the easiest way to get started on this would be the old
idea of separating that capture mechanism from ethereal itself into a small
external tool. You could then easily add capability for selecting from a
variety of external capture tools.  (This also resolves some of the security
issues with allowing non-root access to ethereal.)

The real problem though becomes the limitations of libpcap, since it is
currently defining the encapsulations/media-types/etc. If ethereal were to
do that itself, it would be easy enough to add a 'usb' encapsulation type.

-- Nathan

------------------------------------------------------------
Nathan Neulinger                       EMail:  nneul@xxxxxxx
University of Missouri - Rolla         Phone: (573) 341-4841
Computing Services                       Fax: (573) 341-4216


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ronnie Sahlberg [mailto:rsahlber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 4:08 AM
> To: ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Ethereal-dev] Where to find more protocols for ethereal
> 
> 
> Hi again list,
> 
> Bored tonight so weird thoughts wanders into my mind.
> I guess ethereal is soon running short of protocols to add to 
> it so why not come up with something new that might give us 
> lots of other new protocols to add.
> 
> I just thought, ethereal is basically just a tool to read 
> packets and analyze and display the data it contains. 
> Currently ethereal only reads packets from network devices. I 
> cant see it impossible (in theory) to also include other 
> types of packet interfaces/devices as say 
> SCSI/USB/firewire/IDE etc. They are conceptually similar, you 
> send/receive packets. This might actually be extremely useful.
> 
> If it was possible to access those interfaces (in promisc 
> mode) in any way reasonable similar to netword devices 
> wouldnt it be wild to capture packets on the USB interface? 
> (might help the developers of linux/bsd usb drivers)
> 
> I cant see why not...
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ether> eal-dev
>